header-logo header-logo

15 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The future for conveyancing

Buyers would make a legal commitment when they offered on a property while a secure online portal would hold information on behalf of all parties involved, under the Conveyancing Association’s vision for the future.

In a white paper published this week, Modernising the Home Moving Process, the Association highlights the benefit of greater certainty earlier in the home moving process. It suggests this can be achieved by centralising the identity verification of the parties to reduce the risk of fraud and money laundering, collating the property information and title information on the marketing of a property, and requiring a legal commitment on offer to reduce transaction failures.

It proposes requiring completion monies to be sent through the day before completion, amending the Commonhold & Leasehold Reform Act 2002 to reduce delays in the leasehold sales process, and providing a reliable lending decision-in-principle based on a “hard” credit report without impacting on the applicant’s credit score.

A secure online portal would hold all communications between the parties and their agents, protecting them from potential fraud and enabling parties to update and amend information quickly.

Eddie Goldsmith, the Association’s Chairman and partner at Goldsmith Williams, said conveyancing times between offer and completion have steadily increased from eight weeks to 13 weeks, and even longer for leasehold transactions.

“We freely admit there is a huge ambition to much of the white paper, particularly around the need for greater digitisation and a joined-up technology hub through which all aspects of the process are accessed,” he said.

“However, there are also a number of potential ‘quick win’ solutions identified within the paper which, with the right head wind, could be achieved.”

Peter Ambrose, director of property solicitors The Partnership, said: “Most of the white paper’s recommendations are entirely feasible.

“In fact, we have already adopted many of them through centralised data provision.”

 

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll