header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Funding shortfall threatens court system

Courts

An alleged £90m financial black hole in the courts service budget highlights fundamental problems in the government’s approach to court funding, causing problems for all those concerned, say lawyers.

In a letter leaked to the Conservative Party, Lord Justice Leveson warns that £27m of cost saving exercises must be made by March 2009 to off set the effects of a sharp fall in court income—a total saving of £90m must be made over the next three years and that redundancies may become a reality.

The letter says the fall in court income has resulted from a reduction in the number of cases brought by HM Revenue & Customs to retrieve unpaid taxes in the magistrates’ courts. It is also claims that reductions in debt collection has led to a funding shortfall.

David Greene, president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, says the shortfall shows that the government is willing to abandon responsibility for maintaining the court system. “For many years, the court system has been run on the principle that it should be selffunding,” he says.

“This means that the burden of running our courts falls on the less well-off who become embroiled in the civil court process either through debt proceedings or housing possessions and then have to pay the costs orders against them.”

Issue: 7336 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll