header-logo header-logo

22 May 2015
Issue: 7653 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

The friendly approach

nlj_7653_myers

Blood is not necessarily thicker than water where will validity is concerned, observes Emma Myers

Pensioner, Ronald Butcher, left more than a monetary legacy when he died. The challenge to his decision to change his will late in the day cutting out family members in favour of someone who’d done him a good turn has highlighted important issues around validating wills and the court’s attitude relatives’ claims.

Seventy-five-year-old Mr Butcher, a bachelor from Enfield in north London, changed his will to disinherit his cousin and two family friends, instead leaving his entire £500,000 estate to a builder who had reportedly cleaned his gutter for free.

The earlier beneficiaries claimed that Mr Butcher did not know and approve of the will’s contents. However, their inability to provide evidence to support this led the court to uphold the will in favour of builder Daniel Bryan Sharp.

Mr Butcher and Mr Sharp met in 2009 and remained friends after the original gutter-clearing job. Mr Sharp of Welling, Kent, would look in on the pensioner whenever he was in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll