header-logo header-logo

Freedom of expression: what’s acceptable? Pt 2

16 May 2025 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail
218610
Nicholas Dobson follows up on Higgs v Farmor’s School, examining the Court of Appeal judgment on a gross misconduct dismissal
  • In a follow-up to his 2023 article on Higgs v Farmor’s School, ‘Freedom of expression: what’s acceptable?’, the author analyses the recent Court of Appeal judgment.
  • The court found that the claimant’s dismissal for re-posting ‘inflammatory’ material on same-sex marriage and gender choice could not proportionately justify her dismissal, which therefore constituted unlawful direct discrimination.

Older people, despite having always lived in England, will nevertheless for many years have inhabited a foreign country—at least in terms of the famous opening of LP Hartley’s 1953 novel, The Go-Between: ‘The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.’ For what were mainstream views on sex, marriage and gender in the 1950s were, in employment terms, considered dismissible conduct when expressed in 2018.

This was once again apparent when the Court of Appeal revisited on appeal a decision made by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Higgs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll