header-logo header-logo

06 September 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Free-wheeling curbed

The requirement to give advance notice of mass cycle rides is a worrying incursion on civil liberties, says Seamus Burns

Since 1994, cyclists have gathered near the National Film Theatre on the South Bank, London, at a set time early in the evening of the last Friday of each month for a mass ride through the streets of London, dubbed “Critical Mass”, with 100 to 400 cyclists taking part. Those features of the cycle ride are fixed, but the route is not. Since 1994 over 150 monthly mass cycle rides have taken place.

The Metropolitan Police commissioner had unsuccessfully argued in the Divisional Court, comprised of Lord Justice Sedley and Mr Justice Gray (see Kay v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2006] EWHC 1536 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 304 (Jun)) that the cycle rides were processions which the organisers were required to give the police advance notice of under the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986), s 11 and that the organisers had failed to do this.

However, the Divisional Court held that the monthly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll