header-logo header-logo

Forgotten defenders

08 November 2007 / Andrew Tucker , Andrew Buckham
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Are we failing our armed forces? ask Andrew Buckham and Andrew Tucker

The scale of compensation payable to injured service personnel under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme (AFCS) is under scrutiny after details of the case of Lance Bombardier Ben Parkinson were highlighted by the media. Ben, aged 24, a soldier serving on an operational tour in Afghanistan, sustained multiple injuries as a result of a mine strike. Ben submitted an application under AFCS, a scheme described by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on its introduction in 2005 as a scheme that “gives modern, fair and simpler arrangements, which focuses help better on the more severely disabled”.

However, the award of £152,150 afforded to Ben under AFCS highlighted that there are significant problems in the way in which the scheme assesses compensation for service personnel who have suffered multiple injuries, and that the scheme needed to be urgently reviewed. Ben’s case has also brought into sharp focus the commitment and sacrifice members of the British armed forces make, what they may expect to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll