header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Football hooliganism rates rise

News

The government is claiming success in its fight against football violence despite the overall number of fans being arrested last season increasing for the first time since 2003-04.

Figures released by the Home Office last week show there were 2,833 football related arrests at league matches, up from 2,673 in 2005-06. More than 3,000 known troublemakers are also subject to football banning orders.
Home Office Minister Vernon Coaker says he is encouraged by the effective use of banning orders—since 2000, 94% of individuals whose orders have expired are “assessed by the police and courts” as no longer posing a risk of football disorder. However, Paul Firth, a retired judge, says: “Mr Coaker mentions ‘the police and courts’, as if to add legitimacy to his claim that the orders are effective. What he omits is the legislative presumption in favour of long banning orders against individuals whom many of us in the courts never perceived as ‘posing a risk of football violence’ in the first place.”
The figures also show an increase in the number of arrests for missile throwing from 68 in 2005-06 to 97 in 2006-07. Firth suggests that this figure is far too low.

“I find it hard to go along with the view that whenever the number of arrests for a particular offence rises, the increase is attributable to a ‘tougher police approach’; but when the arrest figure falls, this is ‘great progress’,” he says.

Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll