header-logo header-logo

Fixed fees worry the City

26 February 2014
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Concern over risks to profitability due to demand for fixed fees

City law firms are experiencing mounting concern about clients’ demands for fixed fees rather than hourly rates. 

The firms fear the rising number of fixed-fee requests will hit their profitability and force them to make permanent adjustments in pricing practice, according to Thomson Reuters Legal annual research among finance directors at the top 100 UK law firms.

Nearly half the finance directors surveyed considered fixed-fee work a high risk to profitability. Only 12% said the trend posed a low risk.

Fixed fees present a higher risk because work can overrun or unforeseen issues arise with the firm powerless to charge for the extra hours involved. Firms are also under pressure to tender competitively, and may under-estimate the cost of work.

Sam Steer, head of large law for Thomson Reuters UK Legal, says: “Finance directors are well aware that getting pricing right is critical to minimising cost over-runs, but this is still relatively new territory for lawyers. Many are still finding their way in assessing costs accurately, particularly for complex or contentious work and at the same time they are under intense pressure to submit competitively-priced tenders which means pricing has to be very tight.”

The firms ranked downward pressure on fees from clients as their number one threat to profitability—more than three-quarters of those surveyed cited demand for discounted fees as the most significant risk faced by their firm, compared to just over half in 2011.

Just over a quarter of finance directors said they were also very concerned about clients consolidating their legal panels—thus reducing the amount of potential work available and driving down fees for those firms that are retained.

Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll