header-logo header-logo

Firms were unable to secure indemnity insurance

12 May 2021
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
Some 60 law firms were forced to close last year because they were unable to obtain professional indemnity insurance (PI).

The figure is higher than the previous year’s 37 firms but is less than accountants predicted, given the rising costs of PI and the economic impact of COVID-19.

According to accountants Hazlewoods, who specialise in the legal profession, premiums rose by about 30% as insurers reduced their share of what they saw as an unprofitable market. Insurers’ scrutiny of law firms also tightened in the last round of renewal due to concerns about the risk of professional negligence claims.

Andy Harris, partner at Hazlewoods, said: ‘Most firms have seen much better than expected cashflow over the last 12 months. This is thanks to the deferral of tax and VAT payments last year and the availability of cheap borrowings through the Bounce Back and CBILS loan schemes, which have allowed them to pay their PI premiums.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll