header-logo header-logo

10 July 2014
Issue: 7614 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Firms warned over Wonga-style fake-ups

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned in-house legal departments against sending misleading letters to debtors that wrongly give the impression an external law firm has been instructed to take action to pursue the debt.

Richard Collins, SRA executive director, says: “We believe such approaches do not meet the requirements of the Code of Conduct.”

However, NLJ consultant editor David Greene, a partner at Edwin Coe, says: “That’s all very well in the event that there are in-house solicitors.

“The problem arises when there are not in-house solicitors, as is very often the case. Unfortunately the SRA here is dealing with a small part of the problem. Many debt collectors fake up letters to make them look like solicitors letters or make up forms of demand as though they are issued by a court.”

The action follows a scandal at loans company Wonga, where misleading letters falsely purporting to be from non-existent independent firms of solicitors were sent to debtors. Wonga has been ordered by the Financial Conduct Authority to pay £2.6m compensation.

Issue: 7614 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll