header-logo header-logo

Firms warned on sanctions compliance

30 January 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , International
printer mail-detail
More than 1,000 law firms have been identified as having no or poor controls when it comes to compliance with financial sanctions

A breach of UK sanctions is a criminal offence, punishable by a fine or imprisonment.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced this week it has written to all the firms concerned, offering guidance on compliance, along with a template for firms to use.

Juliet Oliver, SRA deputy chief executive, said: ‘Strengthening the financial sanctions regime is an important part of the government’s response to war in Europe, and law firms have a key role to play.

‘The sanctions regime applies to all firms that provide legal services, not just those that are captured by the anti-money laundering regulations. Firms we have written to responded to our survey last year by saying they did not have or were not aware of a written-down firm-wide risk assessment, or the process for identifying an ultimate beneficial owner.’

Last week, the UK, US and Australia imposed co-ordinated sanctions against key figures involved in financing Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). This is the third round of sanctions by the UK against Hamas and PIJ since the 7 October attacks. Previous rounds sanctioned other top-ranking officials and financiers of Hamas.

The Foreign Office said the asset freezes and travel bans target five individuals, including financier Zuheir Shamlakh, who is believed to have used his money exchange and cryptocurrencies to move large amounts of Iranian funding to Hamas ahead of the 7 October attacks, using legitimate businesses as a front.

According to a report published last week by market intelligence specialists Diligent, ‘Compliance trends 2024’, 21,784 new sanctions were imposed in 2023 (a 50% increase), making third party due diligence a top priority for compliance professionals.

Josh Black, editor-in-chief at Diligent, said: ‘With sanctions changing rapidly, it is increasingly important for companies to have robust and transparent compliance processes in place.’

Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Ceri Morgan analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Johnson v FirstRand Bank
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
In this month's update, employment guru Ian Smith reveals the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s pivotal role in the ongoing supermarket equal pay litigation, upholding most findings and confirming that detailed training materials are valid evidence of actual work
County court cases are speeding up, with the median time from claim to hearing 62 weeks for fast, intermediate and multi-track claims—5.4 weeks faster than last year
back-to-top-scroll