header-logo header-logo

30 January 2024
Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , International
printer mail-detail

Firms warned on sanctions compliance

More than 1,000 law firms have been identified as having no or poor controls when it comes to compliance with financial sanctions

A breach of UK sanctions is a criminal offence, punishable by a fine or imprisonment.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced this week it has written to all the firms concerned, offering guidance on compliance, along with a template for firms to use.

Juliet Oliver, SRA deputy chief executive, said: ‘Strengthening the financial sanctions regime is an important part of the government’s response to war in Europe, and law firms have a key role to play.

‘The sanctions regime applies to all firms that provide legal services, not just those that are captured by the anti-money laundering regulations. Firms we have written to responded to our survey last year by saying they did not have or were not aware of a written-down firm-wide risk assessment, or the process for identifying an ultimate beneficial owner.’

Last week, the UK, US and Australia imposed co-ordinated sanctions against key figures involved in financing Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). This is the third round of sanctions by the UK against Hamas and PIJ since the 7 October attacks. Previous rounds sanctioned other top-ranking officials and financiers of Hamas.

The Foreign Office said the asset freezes and travel bans target five individuals, including financier Zuheir Shamlakh, who is believed to have used his money exchange and cryptocurrencies to move large amounts of Iranian funding to Hamas ahead of the 7 October attacks, using legitimate businesses as a front.

According to a report published last week by market intelligence specialists Diligent, ‘Compliance trends 2024’, 21,784 new sanctions were imposed in 2023 (a 50% increase), making third party due diligence a top priority for compliance professionals.

Josh Black, editor-in-chief at Diligent, said: ‘With sanctions changing rapidly, it is increasingly important for companies to have robust and transparent compliance processes in place.’

Issue: 8057 / Categories: Legal News , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll