header-logo header-logo

08 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Firms warned on dirty money

A review of money-laundering compliance at 59 law firms has resulted in 26 firms being referred to Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) disciplinary processes.

The SRA issued a stern warning this week that it will take ‘strong action’ against firms with inadequate procedures in place, after its review revealed a ‘significant minority’ were not doing enough to meet their obligations under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 (SI 2016/692).

The firms were chosen because they create and administer trusts and companies on behalf of clients, a high-risk area for exploitation by criminals.

Poor risk assessment procedures were uncovered at 24 firms, including four firms with no risk assessment procedures in place at all. Inadequate customer due diligence was found at 14 firms.

Only ten firms had submitted suspicious activity reports (SARs) in the past two years. The SRA notes this tallies with concerns raised by the National Crime Agency that generally law firms are not being proactive enough in looking to identify and then report suspicious activity.

The review found no evidence of actual money laundering or intent to become involved in criminal activities.

The SRA has now launched a second review, of 400 law firms.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, warned: ‘Too many firms are falling short.

‘Those firms should be on notice that compliance is not optional. They need to improve swiftly. Where we have serious concerns that a firm could be enabling money laundering, we will take strong action.’

John Binns, partner at BCL Solicitors, said HMRC fines for non-compliance with money laundering regulations rose by more than 90% in 12 months last year as ‘part of an increasingly hostile environment’.

Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Regulatory , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll