header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Dr Nicholas Roberts
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Fire safety post-Grenfell

nlj_7763_roberts

Nicholas Roberts explores the practicalities of assigning responsibility for fire safety in long leasehold flats

  • Legislative reform on fire safety is likely to be introduced in response to the Grenfell Tower disaster.
  • Technical legal difficulties arise when deciding who is responsible for what.
  • Under the ‘light touch’ regulations introduced in 2005, risks are usually exposed by an independent risk assessment, which does not have the status of a statutory authority.

The tragedy at Grenfell Tower has focused attention on the fire risks involved with multi-storey blocks of flats, and it seems likely that stronger legislative measures will be introduced to address the fire safety issues. This may, therefore, be an appropriate time to consider some of the ways in which the current legal provisions relating to fire safety measures are either failing to address the problems of long leasehold flats, or make it difficult for those with the responsibility for managing flats to make recommended changes. The problems seem to originate from two main sources:

  • Any survey of fire precautions will rightly
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll