header-logo header-logo

04 February 2020
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fire at Chancery Lane

Just three days after the fire, all teams are back in 113!

Twenty-five fire engines and about 150 firefighters attended a significant fire at the historic Law Society headquarters on Chancery Lane at the weekend.

London Fire Brigade said ‘the roof of the six-storey building and a staircase from the third to the fifth floor were destroyed by the fire. Half of the third and fourth floor were also damaged’.

Firefighters were called at 10.40 pm on Saturday and the fire was under control by 9.48am the next day.

Guests and staff attending a Junior Lawyers Division dinner in the building, and 11 people from nearby flats, were evacuated.

Assistant Commissioner Dom Ellis, who was at the scene, said: ‘This was a very complex fire due to the age and layout of the building.

‘Firefighters worked throughout the night in very challenging and arduous conditions to prevent the fire from spreading to key areas of the historic building, while also trying to prevent water damage. Crews remained on scene throughout Sunday damping down and cutting away. They also carried out salvage work to minimise damage to the building.’

Paul Tennant, chief executive of the Law Society of England and Wales, hailed the efforts of fire fighters who helped preserve the organisation’s Grade 2 listed building at 113 and 114 Chancery Lane in the capital when fire broke out.

‘Our first concern was for our guests and staff and once we established there were no injuries our thoughts turned to our landmark building,’ Tenant said. While the fire caused extensive damage to the roof and upper floors of 114 we are delighted that 113 -  housing the library, Reading Room and other key areas most familiar to our members and visitors - was preserved. We are indebted to the remarkable work of the fire service.  

 ‘Just three days after the fire, our teams are back in 113, our doors are open and planned events and meetings are going ahead which is a testament to our staff and everyone who works with the Society. 

 ‘I would like to thank the many people who sent good wishes and messages of support and offers of help – all of these were greatly appreciated at this challenging time. We have begun the process of assessing the damage and managing the next stage of our recovery.’

 

Issue: 7873 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll