header-logo header-logo

Fines hike for solicitors & law firms

22 February 2023
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Disciplinary&grievance procedures
printer mail-detail
Proposals to fine firms up to 5% of their annual turnover for breaches of the professional rule book have been confirmed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

While fixed penalties of £750 or £1,500 will be charged for low-level misconduct, such as failing to publish the required costs or complaints information, fines for both individuals and firms for more serious breaches will be based on percentages of gross income or turnover. These would range from 0.2% to 5%.

The SRA intends to pilot the use of personal impact statements in cases of sexual misconduct, discrimination or harassment. It will also publish information on disciplinary decisions for longer periods, ranging from three years for warnings and fines to permanently for strike-off decisions.

The new regime is due to take effect on 30 May, subject to Legal Services Board approval.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: 'When we need to step in and take action it is important that we have a transparent and effective disciplinary approach in place.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll