header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Chloe Carpenter
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Finding the energy

web_carpenter

Ofgem already has power to prevent non-transparent pricing mechanisms, Chloe Carpenter argues

On 27 August 2013, new standards of conduct imposed by energy market regulator Ofgem on energy suppliers came into force. These require suppliers to behave and carry out actions in a “fair, honest, transparent and appropriate manner”, provide information which is “complete, accurate and not misleading”, “communicated in plain and intelligible language” and which is “fair both in terms of its content and in terms of how it is presented”. The standards are backed by fines if necessary.

This is to be followed by other changes, including suppliers being limited to four “core” tariffs by the end of December 2013 (in the absence of any appeal to the Competition Commission from an energy company). It would seem that this further change is intended, in part, to eliminate so-called “multi-tier tariffs” whereby one energy company charges, eg, 10p per unit for the first 50 units, then 8p per unit for the next 100 units, then 6p per unit for the next 1000 units

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll