header-logo header-logo

Financially entwined

12 August 2010 / Matthew Snarr
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , CPR
printer mail-detail

When is a financially interested party entitled to be joined to proceedings, asks Matthew Snarr

In Bottomley (by her litigation friend Helen Ryan) v East Midlands Strategic Health Authority [2010] EWCA Civ 756, [2010] All ER (D) 23 (Jul) the Court of Appeal considered the right of a local authority to be joined to proceedings involving a seriously injured claimant. The local authority wished to make representations as to the form of any settlement or judgment which was likely to significantly affect its own financial liabilities. In short, the case turned on whether or not the court ought to take into consideration the representations by a party who has a significant financial stake in the outcome of the decision to order periodical payments or a lump sum.  
 
The facts

The claimant was a 16-year-old girl who had suffered hypoxic ischemia resulting in brain damage and associated spastic quadriplegia arising out of the defendant’s negligent mismanagement of her birth. Liability was admitted. The claimant’s litigation friend was the local authority’s director of social

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll