header-logo header-logo

Finance Act 2011 (Bank Levy: Amendment of Netting Agreements Provisions) Order 2011 (SI 2011/Draft)

29 November 2011
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Amends the Finance Act 2011, Sch 19 which makes provision for netting in relation to the bank levy.

Legislation Affected
Finance Act 2011 amended

Summary

Amends the Finance Act 2011, Sch 19 which makes provision for netting in relation to the bank levy.

Ensures that:

- the provisions apply to cases where the bank or entity either receives securities as collateral (and subsequently sells them) or provides securities as collateral to a counterparty; and

- in the event of the insolvency of either party, the liabilities and assets recognised on the bank or the entity’s balance sheet from these transactions will qualify for netting.

Has effect in relation to chargeable periods ending on or after 1

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll