header-logo header-logo

08 April 2022
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Finally…no-fault divorce

Family lawyers have hailed the new era of fault-free divorce, which takes effect this week after decades of campaigning

The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 removes the need to prove marriage breakdown by the fact of adultery or unreasonable behaviour or require the couple to have lived apart for two or five years. This is ‘an important change in the law, and a significant change in the language that will now be used, which will be invaluable in changing the public perception of one party having to be to blame for the breakdown of the relationship’, said Simon Donald, partner at Cripps Pemberton Greenish.

Graham Coy, head of family at Wilsons Solicitors, anticipated some people might ignore the mediator’s advice to consult a lawyer and end up not seeking legal advice until their divorce was at an advanced stage. He also predicted ‘a trend in simple cases becoming unnecessarily complicated’ where people ran into problems after attempting to ‘navigate the legal landscape without legal advice’.

Family lawyers have reported clients choosing to wait for the ‘no-fault’ option to become available. Zoe Porter, partner at Ashfords said she expects ‘a surge in applications’ but also some delays. 

‘With so much of the country suffering the effects of COVID, most sectors are experiencing staff shortages and the court system is no different,’ she said. 

‘We are already experiencing long delays in the process of applications (and the listing of hearings depending on where in the country you are based) and I can see this continuing for the foreseeable future.’

Research by law firm Fladgate shows one in two divorcees would have plumped for a no-fault divorce had it been an option at the time (70% of men and 40% of women).

More than one quarter (28%) believed fault-free divorce would have made their split less acrimonious.

Fladgate partner Hetty Gleave said: ‘It is anticipated that this will help to ease up the pressure placed on the already stretched court system in England and Wales, who will be freed from entering into the quagmire of marital “he said/she said” and attributing blame for the breakdown of marriages.’

Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll