header-logo header-logo

Finally…no-fault divorce

08 April 2022
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Divorce
printer mail-detail
Family lawyers have hailed the new era of fault-free divorce, which takes effect this week after decades of campaigning

The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 removes the need to prove marriage breakdown by the fact of adultery or unreasonable behaviour or require the couple to have lived apart for two or five years. This is ‘an important change in the law, and a significant change in the language that will now be used, which will be invaluable in changing the public perception of one party having to be to blame for the breakdown of the relationship’, said Simon Donald, partner at Cripps Pemberton Greenish.

Graham Coy, head of family at Wilsons Solicitors, anticipated some people might ignore the mediator’s advice to consult a lawyer and end up not seeking legal advice until their divorce was at an advanced stage. He also predicted ‘a trend in simple cases becoming unnecessarily complicated’ where people ran into problems after attempting to ‘navigate the legal landscape without legal advice’.

Family lawyers have reported clients choosing to wait for the ‘no-fault’ option to become available. Zoe Porter, partner at Ashfords said she expects ‘a surge in applications’ but also some delays. 

‘With so much of the country suffering the effects of COVID, most sectors are experiencing staff shortages and the court system is no different,’ she said. 

‘We are already experiencing long delays in the process of applications (and the listing of hearings depending on where in the country you are based) and I can see this continuing for the foreseeable future.’

Research by law firm Fladgate shows one in two divorcees would have plumped for a no-fault divorce had it been an option at the time (70% of men and 40% of women).

More than one quarter (28%) believed fault-free divorce would have made their split less acrimonious.

Fladgate partner Hetty Gleave said: ‘It is anticipated that this will help to ease up the pressure placed on the already stretched court system in England and Wales, who will be freed from entering into the quagmire of marital “he said/she said” and attributing blame for the breakdown of marriages.’

Issue: 7974 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Profession , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll