header-logo header-logo

The final fight

28 March 2014 / Henrietta Mason , Paola Fudakowska
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
web_mason

Paola Fudakowska & Henrietta Mason provide a wills & probate round-up

In the case of Marley v Rawlings and Anor [2014] UKSC 2, [2014] 1 All ER 807, Alfred Rawlings and his wife Maureen Rawlings executed wills drafted by their solicitor on 17 May 1999. The wills were identical; each spouse left his or her estate to the other, and then to Terry Marley, who they treated as their son.

By an oversight, the solicitor gave each spouse the other’s draft will, which were then signed in error.

Mrs Rawlings died in 2003. Her estate passed to Mr Rawlings without anyone noticing the error, which only came to light when Mr Rawlings died in August 2006. Mr and Mrs Rawlings’ two sons challenged the validity of the will that Mr Rawlings had signed. If it was invalid, Mr Rawlings would have died intestate and the sons would inherit the estate.

Mr Marley sought rectification of the will signed by Mr Rawlings under s 20 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll