header-logo header-logo

Fightback against scams

05 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rip-off traders & scam merchants targeted by Law Commissions

Consumers would be given extra protection against rip-off traders and scam merchants, under legal reforms proposed by the Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission.

The commissioners’ report, Consumer Redress for Misleading and Aggressive Practices, published last week, recommends a new legal right of redress against traders that carry out misleading or aggressive practices. Consumers would be entitled to a refund or a discount on the price, and damages could be available if the unfair practice caused additional loss. The new law would also cover situations where companies aggressively harass consumers for payment, where remedies would include refund or damages for distress.

Law Commissioner David Hertzell says: “By simplifying the law, our recommended reforms will give more confidence to consumers and help drive rogue traders out of the market place, where currently they damage the reputation and livelihood of good, honest businesses.”

Citizens Advice chief executive Gillian Guy says: “The law has neglected to recognise that people should get their money back when they have been subjected to pressure selling.

“Complex laws on misrepresentation have also failed consumers who have been blatantly misled by sales people. We need a simple consumer law to help consumers get a refund or compensation in these cases so that shoppers aren’t left with a sting in their pocket, and we need it fast.”

Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll