Caroline Bowden examines whether cases containing complex factors, but wealthy spouses, should be easy to settle
The case of Fields v Fields [2015] EWHC 167 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 163 (Jun) was a tabloid dream, with its exotic cocktail of a Russian Beauty Queen who was divorcing a five times married, wealthy US lawyer.
Beneath the drama, Mr Justice Holman was frustrated at the case costs of over £1m, out of liquid assets of £4.5m. As each party would retain “considerable prosperity”, he thought it should have been “very easy” to settle.
Yet at the same time, in a judgment of over 13,000 words, he identified multiple complex and disputed issues. He never criticised anyone for defining and probing these issues: indeed they appeared to be vital to his carefully considered order. So what, if anything, makes an out-of-court settlement easier or more likely for the wealthier clients?
The order
The husband earned £1.3m-£1.9m a year and the wife did not work. He was ordered to pay his wife £320,000 a year
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=e3c4b2f1_1)
