header-logo header-logo

Fees hike goes ahead

06 March 2015
Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The controversial court fees hike went ahead despite a concerted attempt by the legal profession to stop them.

Court fees rose by as much as 600% from the start of this week. Court users will be charged an extra fee of 5% of the value of all claims worth more than £10,000, up to a maximum of £10,000. The government claims this will bring in an extra £120m, but opponents argue it will price individuals and small businesses out of the courts.

Speaking against the proposals, Lord Pannick warned they would do “inevitable and substantial damage to access to justice” and that was “simply perverse for the government to dispute that many small businesses and many personal injury claimants are going to be unable to pay an upfront £10,000 fee as the price of access to the courts”.

He added: “For many people—those suing for debts or to recover compensation for personal injury—litigation is often a necessity to keep your business alive or to maintain any quality of life. The Minister is absolutely right that there are already many impediments to access to justice. That is surely no justification—no excuse—for the state to erect further high barriers.”

The Law Society has launched a judicial review against the fees increase, and the fee rise is unpopular across the legal profession.

Commercial lawyers have warned it could make the English legal system less competitive than international rivals such as Singapore and Dubai.

Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll