header-logo header-logo

FCA authorisation risk

16 October 2014
Issue: 7626 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers who advise clients on the financial aspects of their divorces, and firms involved in debt recovery work, may have to be authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in future.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) says it is aware of more than 1,100 firms that carry out debt recovery, one area of consumer credit work. Solicitors could require FCA authorisation if they discuss finance with a divorce client and negotiate terms with creditors on behalf of that client for settlement of a joint debt. A solicitor advising on a property deal who seeks to amend information held by a credit information agency about their client’s financial standing would also be caught.

Authorisation became an issue on 1 April, when regulation for consumer credit work passed from the Office of Fair Trading to the FCA. Previously, solicitors were regulated under a group licence managed by the SRA. However, the FCA has not continued this arrangement, and transitional arrangements are due to run out on 1 April 2015.

Firms could then rely on an exemption which allows them to be overseen by a “designated professional body”—the SRA, in this case. However, the SRA is reluctant to adopt the required parts of the FCA’s sourcebook, called CONC.

Crispin Passmore, SRA executive director for policy, says: “It is vital that clients receive the proper protections, and the FCA are much better placed to regulate these activities than we are.”

An SRA consultation on the issue runs until 15 December 2014.

Issue: 7626 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll