header-logo header-logo

16 October 2014
Issue: 7626 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Farmers v BP battle begins

Environmental case will make English legal history

The High Court will hear one of the biggest environmental cases in English legal history this week as Colombian farmers begin a court fight against BP.

The trial, scheduled to last four months, is unusual in that BP is being asked to defend its actions overseas in an English court. The case also marks the first time litigation has been brought in the UK against a UK oil company to seek compensation for damage to privately owned land.

The 73 farmers allege that Equion Energia (formerly BP Exploration (Colombia) Ltd) breached agreements and were negligent in causing environmental damage to their private property due to the construction of the OCENSA oil pipeline across their farmland in the mid-1990s. They claim the construction work caused severe soil erosion and sedimentation of low-lying fields and water sources, reduced vegetation coverage and blocked up water sources.

The claims will be argued with reference to contractual and extra contractual liability under Colombian law.

Shubhaa Srinivasan, partner at Leigh Day & Co, who is representing the farmers, says: “We feel it is really important that big companies are held to account for the way in which they undertake their activities abroad—especially when those activities take place in remote corners of faraway places out of the public gaze.”

A BP spokesperson says: “The OCENSA pipeline project involved significant steps being taken at the time of construction to engage with local communities, make appropriate compensation payments and ensure that the land that the pipeline traversed suffered no material damage.

“BP believes that these measures were effective and that the construction of the pipeline was carried out to a high standard.”

Issue: 7626 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll