header-logo header-logo

Family proceedings

03 February 2017
Issue: 7732 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re A and others (Children) (Adoption) [2017] EWHC 35 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 55 (Jan)

The Family Division ruled on preliminary points raised in the context of applications for adoption, by prospective adoptive parents who lived in England, of Scottish children, in relation to each of whom a Scottish Sheriff had made a permanence order with authority to adopt, under ss 80 and 83 of the Adoption and Children (Scotland) Act 2007. Among other things, the court held that the English court had jurisdiction to make adoption orders in the context of the present case, that the English court should recognise the Scottish orders and that, applying settled law, and on the true construction of s 105 of the Adoption of Children Acts 2002, as amended, the English court did not need to obtain consent of the natural parent(s) before making an adoption order, under s 47 of the 2002 Act, because the natural parents no longer had parental responsibility in respect of the children in question.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll