header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail

Family legal aid set to suffer?

Fears as substantial number of family firms fail bidding round

Solicitor’s firms are licking their wounds after receiving the results of the family legal aid bid round, with lawyers warnings of advice deserts and widespread redundancies.

A survey by family law group Resolution of 561 firms revealed that 40% have been wholly unsuccessful in their competitive tendering bids to provide family legal aid, while 15% were only partially successful. The firms said they expect to have to make up to 542 redundancies.

The survey results suggest people in need of help could in the future fail to find a legal adviser. Family lawyers expressed concerns that domestic abuse victims in need of emergency legal aid and those in need of specialist legal advice on issues such as forced marriage could struggle to find help.

Practitioners warned of emerging “advice deserts” in Dorset, Cornwall, Bedfordshire and Lincolnshire. Cornwall now has only five family legal aid providers operating from 11 offices in the county.

David Allison, chair of Resolution, said: “Our survey has painted a very worrying picture for the future of legal aid provision in England and Wales.
“We have pressed the Legal Services Commission for a full picture of the contracts awarded but this will not be published until the appeals process ends. Our survey tells us that 86% of those who were unsuccessful will be appealing and it is clear that the complete picture is unlikely to emerge until very shortly before the contracts start on 14 October.”

He added: “There are signs already of movement in the market, with mergers, acquisitions and movement of staff, but it remains to be seen whether the market can fully adjust quickly enough.

“While we knew that competitive tendering was coming, delays in the award of contracts has left firms little time to open new offices, make people redundant or plan recruitments.”

Resolution has called on the government for an urgent statement of the practical steps they will take to remedy the shortfall.
 

Issue: 7431 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll