header-logo header-logo

19 April 2024 / David Burrows
Issue: 8067 / Categories: Features , In Court , Family , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Family law & the judicial line of influence

168631
David Burrows pays tribute to the enduring work of a legion of influential family judges
  • Covers seminal judgments by family court judges, including Lord Scarman, Lord Nicholls and Lady Hale.

What influence have individual judges had on the development and practice of family law over the past 30 or 40 years? Through those years the shadow—mostly benign—of the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) has been long. So too has the Human Rights Act 1998 and all must be seen through the procedural prism of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR 1998) and its pale imitation, the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010). But how has the common law progressed?

Development of the common law by presidents of the Family Division has been slight. It is hampered by the varied roles assigned to individual presidents. None have made a real mark on the law, even Munby P for all his administrative schemes and passion for ‘transparency’. The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 defined separation of powers principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll