header-logo header-logo

Family—Divorce—Arbitration

08 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

AI v MT [2013] EWHC 100 (Fam)

Family Division, Baker J, 30 January 2013

The High Court has approved a consent order based on a Beth Din procedure in divorce proceedings.

Henry Setright QC and Edward Devereux (instructed by Dawson Cornwell) for the applicant. Marcus Scott-Manderson QC and Teertha Gupta QC (instructed by Manches LLP) for the respondent. 

Both parties to a divorce proceeding were observant orthodox Jews. The father was Canadian and the mother was British. They married in London in August 2006 in a Jewish religious ceremony, followed by a civil ceremony in Toronto in October 2006. There were two children. Tensions arose and the mother applied for a prohibitive steps order against the father, to stop him removing one of the children from her care. After negotiations, the parties agreed to consider alternative dispute resolution by means of a Beth Din hearing in New York. They signed an agreement providing for all disputes arising out of the marriage to be determined by the Beth Din. The judge indicated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll