header-logo header-logo

Family

30 June 2011
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Re B (children) (adoption) [2011] EWCA Civ 729, [2011] All ER (D) 159 (Jun)

A judge had jurisdiction to make an injunction to prevent the removal of children in short-term foster placements by the local authority, pending the hearing of an application for an adoption order. In determining whether to make the injunction, the judge should pose to himself, and seek to answer, an initial question as follows:

(a) was there a real prospect that the foster parents would establish that the authority’s decision to remove the children from them notwithstanding that they wished to adopt them was, by reference to public law principles, irrational, disproportionate or otherwise unlawful or was otherwise in breach of their rights, or those of the adopters or of those of the children under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. If the judge’s answer to question (a) was negative, he should refuse to grant the injunction. However, if his answer to the question was affirmative, he should proceed to address further questions which, without purporting to be prescriptive, might run along

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll