13 November 2009 / Carolyn Regan

Issue: 7393 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus

In the eye of the storm

In its 60th year, the legal aid scheme, in common with the rest of the public sector, has to live within its means.

In its 60th year, the legal aid scheme, in common with the rest of the public sector, has to live within its means.

My organisation, the Legal Services Commission (LSC) is working within a fixed budget, and that’s not going to change. However, we remain resolutely focused on our clients, and that’s not going to change, either.

Indeed, within our budget of just over £2bn per annum we’re helping more people than ever with a record 2.9m acts of legal advice last year.

We are meeting—and will continue to meet—the increased demand from clients struggling to deal with the impact of the recession by increasing the amount of appropriate local services. One way is through Community Legal Advice Centres and Networks (CLACs and CLANs).

Increased integration

This integrated approach to advice, jointly commissioned by the LSC and various local authorities, provides a one-stop service that has gone some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

In the eye of the storm

In its 60th year, the legal aid scheme, in common with the rest of the public sector, has to live within its means.

In its 60th year, the legal aid scheme, in common with the rest of the public sector, has to live within its means.

Indeed, within our budget of just over £2bn per annum we’re helping more people than ever with a record 2.9m acts of legal advice last year.

Increased integration

This integrated approach to advice, jointly commissioned by the LSC and various local authorities, provides a one-stop service that has gone some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations

The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment

NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law

Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes

NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession

The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself

NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap

A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’

NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads

Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design

Error message

In the eye of the storm

Increased integration

Increased integration

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Switalskis—Grimsby

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury