header-logo header-logo

Extradition—Convention rights—Polish extradition

07 September 2012
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Krolik and others v Several Judicial Authorities of Poland [2012] EWHC 2357 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 107 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (London), Sir John Thomas P and Globe J, 17 August 2012

The Administrative Court has given guidance on the future treatment of appeals against extradition to Poland where an appellant relies upon the alleged prison conditions in Poland to support a submission under Art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Mark Smith (instructed under the Direct Access Scheme) for the appellants. Hannah Pye and Katherine Tyler (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the judicial authorities.

Six extradition appeals were listed together as in each case the sole issue was the same, namely whether to extradite the appellants under either accusation or conviction European Arrest Warrants would be a breach of Art 3 of the Convention by reason of prison conditions in Poland. One of the purposes of hearing the six appeals together was to enable the court to set out the way

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll