header-logo header-logo

09 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , International , Rule of law
printer mail-detail

Extending support to US colleagues

The Law Society and Bar Council have endorsed a Europe-wide statement of support for US lawyers targeted by President Donald Trump’s administration.

Since March, President Trump has been putting pressure on certain law firms and lawyers he views as hostile to his policies. His administration has threatened to impeach and disbar judges whose decisions they don’t like, and issued executive orders and memorandums to limit or revoke law firms’ security clearances, and deny lawyers access to federal buildings and facilities.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has also written to 20 law firms in March, informing them their diversity, equity and inclusion practices have been placed under investigation.

Last week, the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE), representing more than one million lawyers, collectively expressed their support for US colleagues.

‘The efforts of any government to use power to punish individuals and law firms based on their representation of clients or their legal positions are a clear violation of the core principle of legal independence,’ their statement read.

‘The CCBE echoes the American Bar Association's firm rejection of these practices. Lawyers have a duty to act in the best interest of their clients, and no lawyer should face retaliation for fulfilling this duty.’

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The political attacks on independent legal practitioners, the rule of law and the judiciary are abhorrent.

‘We offer our total support to the American Bar Association and our colleagues who are facing such unprecedented challenges and threats. The Bar Council of England and Wales condemns all acts of intimidation and the targeting of lawyers who are simply carrying out their work, often acting in the public interest and upholding our professional ethics.’

Some 500 law firms, including the US branch of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer—the only global elite firm to do so—have signed an amicus brief in support of Perkins Coie, which is the subject of executive orders suspending its security clearance and reviewing its government contracts.

Washington-based top 50 firm Perkins Coie, along with Jenner & Block and WilmerHale, are suing the Trump administration. 

Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , International , Rule of law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll