header-logo header-logo

08 October 2009
Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Experts could be quizzed on civil procedure

Expert witness reports could be ruled inadmissible unless experts include a statement that they understand the rules of civil procedure

Amendments to Pt 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which came into force this month, require experts to sign a revised statement of truth and a new declaration of awareness of the civil procedure rules, practice directions and protocols.

Solicitors will now need to look for evidence that an expert has an understanding of Pt 35. If cases go to court, experts could be cross-examined on their knowledge.

Mark Solon, solicitor and managing director of legal consultancy, Bond Solon, says: “Experts have always needed to know their subject area and their duty to the court.

“This key change was introduced to address the view that many experts have failed to comply with the existing rules. The difficulty is that there is no central body to inform experts of changes to the law that apply to them. Experts come from such diverse areas of expertise, from accountants to zoologists.”

Bond Solon, which runs training courses for experts, will put a short video clip covering the new rules on You Tube. It can also be seen on their website at www.bondsolon.com/Civil-procedure-rules.

Issue: 7388 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll