header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Experts boost support for restorative justice

News

Leading criminologists want the government to create a Restorative Justice Board to work closely with the courts in promoting restorative justice (RJ) across the UK.

The board would make RJ programmes available in all areas of the country, set standards and monitor outcomes, and would report to the Department for Constitutional Affairs.

The benefits of RJ are set out in Restorative Justice: The Evidence, a report published this week by the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and the Smith Institute, which finds that many violent criminals are less likely to commit further offences after participating in an RJ programme.
The report says that crime victims’ post-traumatic stress symptoms are reduced by RJ, and that the number of offences dealt with away from the courts could be doubled.

The research used 36 direct comparisons between RJ and conventional criminal justice, and found that in at least two tests RJ reduced recidivism more than prison; substantially reduced repeat offending for some offenders but not all; reduced the costs of justice when used as diversion from conventional means of justice; and doubled the offences brought to justice as diversion from conventional criminal justice.

Sir Charles Pollard, formerly Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police and chair of the steering group overseeing the research, says: “Offenders often say that RJ is much more challenging than our traditional justice system, and this provides the proof. We now need a properly resourced implementation board...to drive its implementation so that it becomes a normal part of our justice system across the country.”

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll