header-logo header-logo

27 March 2010
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Expats lose human rights appeal in pensions case

British expats are not entitled to have their pensions index-linked, the European Court of Human Rights has ruled

In Carson and Ors v UK (App No 42184/05), 13 claimants argued their state pensions should be up-rated to bring them in line with pensioners living in the UK.

They claimed the difference in treatment amounted to discrimination and breached Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Some 500,000 pensioners living abroad would benefit from up-rating.

However, the court found they were not in the same position as pensioners retiring in the UK or in a country with which the UK has a reciprocal agreement.

There were too many economic and social variables to allow for a comparison between pensioners in the UK and abroad.

The court did not consider the applicants’ payment of National Insurance contributions “to be of any more significance than the fact that they may have paid income tax or other taxes while domiciled there”.

Carson, who lives in South Africa, receives £67.50 a week compared with the £95.25 given to UK pensioners.
 

Issue: 7410 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll