header-logo header-logo

14 February 2024
Issue: 8059 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Exodus of specialist rape counsel

The current crisis in rape and serious sexual offence (RASSO) cases due to a shortage of specialist counsel is set to ‘accelerate exponentially’, the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has warned

The CBA published a survey of its members this week, which found 64% of prosecutors intend not to reapply to be on the RASSO list, and 66% of defence counsel no longer want to conduct RASSO cases. Six out of ten respondents cited poor fees as a reason and half pointed to the detrimental impact on their wellbeing.

The CBA has issued an urgent call for increased fees in this area.

CBA chair Tana Adkin KC said: ‘The human cost for victims of these crimes as well as innocent defendants is beyond financial measure.

‘RASSO cases have been undervalued and underpaid for decades in comparison with other criminal offences. It is time remuneration was increased so that dedicated criminal barristers are able to build proper careers in this specialist field.’

RASSO cases account for nearly 9,800 cases in the Crown Court backlog, which stood at 66,547 as of 30 September 2023—roughly one in seven of backlogged cases. The CBA highlights that the average wait for a bailed rape trial to conclude since an alleged offence is about five and a half years, including an 18-month wait on average from charge to trial completion. However, the CBA has had reports of trial dates being set for the end of 2026 for rape offences charged in 2022.

The CBA said that in the first nine months of last year, 976 RASSO trials were adjourned on the day they were due to begin, 87 due to no prosecution advocate being available and 97 due to no defence advocate being available.

Bar Council chair Sam Townend KC said the ‘horrifying personal experiences’ behind each case took a ‘toll on anyone doing the essential work to put these cases to a fair trial’.

Issue: 8059 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll