header-logo header-logo

“Excellent” immigration cases blocked?

02 May 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers express dismay at MoJ legal aid plans

Proposed changes to legal aid will block immigration cases with “excellent prospects of success”, lawyers have warned.

Proposals for a residence test for civil legal aid and reduced legal aid funding for judicial review are set out in the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation, Transforming Legal Aid, which closes on 4 June.

In its response this week, the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA) said the proposals would result in people with good cases being unable to bring them because they cannot pay or, if eligible for legal aid, are unable to find a lawyer.

Under the residence test, legal aid applicants other than asylum seekers must show “strong connections” to the UK and have lived here lawfully for a year.

ILPA said the proposal to pay providers only for judicial review applications would “undermine the use of pre-action protocols” and make it more difficult for people to find representation.

An MoJ spokesperson says: “There will be some exceptions to the residence test. We would also ensure that legal aid would continue to be available where necessary to comply with obligations under EU or international law.”

Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll