header-logo header-logo

The evolution of Rome

14 January 2010 / Philippa Charles , Daniel Hart
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Cross-border litigation in the EU examined by Philippa Charles & Daniel Hart

The law which governs such contracts is a crucial issue. It can affect what the obligations of the parties are and the circumstances in which the contract may be terminated. It can even determine whether a claim can be made for breach, since limitation periods differ under the laws of different countries.

Governing law in contract claims—Rome I

For contracts concluded after 17 December 2009, the rules for determining the law applicable to contractual obligations will be found in a new Regulation No 593/2008 (known as Rome I). It replaces the Rome Convention of 1980.

Rome I generally mirrors the main principles of the Rome Convention. However, it does make some additions and alterations. The key changes are noted below.

Choice of law made by the parties

The key tenet of Rome I remains that a choice of law made by the parties will generally be upheld (A3(1)). However, other laws may nevertheless be applied in some circumstances. While

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll