header-logo header-logo

19 September 2025 / Nick Brett , Vicky Lankester
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Disclosure , Compliance
printer mail-detail

Evidence withheld, justice denied

230094
CPS non-compliance results in dismissed cases, write Nick Brett & Vicky Lankester. But is change on the way?

Criminal defence practitioners are all too aware of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the body responsible for prosecuting criminal charges against defendants, failing to comply with directions, failing to provide evidence or disclosure as required, and failing to respond to correspondence.

All too often, deadlines pass with not a word from the CPS. When chasers are sent, these are often ignored, too. It is a frustrating part of a defence practitioner’s work that happens far too frequently, with the CPS appearing to ‘get away’ with it, or even worse, the defence being blamed for not chasing enough times. More importantly, a defendant has to endure the anxiety of unnecessarily protracted proceedings, and any extra expense and inconvenience that comes with that. We are all sympathetic to the pressures the publicly funded body is under, but justice must work both ways; defendants are entitled to know and understand the case against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll