header-logo header-logo

Evidence withheld, justice denied

19 September 2025 / Nick Brett , Vicky Lankester
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Disclosure , Compliance
printer mail-detail
230094
CPS non-compliance results in dismissed cases, write Nick Brett & Vicky Lankester. But is change on the way?

Criminal defence practitioners are all too aware of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), the body responsible for prosecuting criminal charges against defendants, failing to comply with directions, failing to provide evidence or disclosure as required, and failing to respond to correspondence.

All too often, deadlines pass with not a word from the CPS. When chasers are sent, these are often ignored, too. It is a frustrating part of a defence practitioner’s work that happens far too frequently, with the CPS appearing to ‘get away’ with it, or even worse, the defence being blamed for not chasing enough times. More importantly, a defendant has to endure the anxiety of unnecessarily protracted proceedings, and any extra expense and inconvenience that comes with that. We are all sympathetic to the pressures the publicly funded body is under, but justice must work both ways; defendants are entitled to know and understand the case against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll