header-logo header-logo

Evidence

13 July 2012
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Omar and others) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2012] EWHC 1737 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 06 (Jul)

The court could not order the provision of evidence for proceedings in overseas courts other than through the statutory regime provided by the Crime (International Co-operation) Act 2003. The legislative history of the statutory regime had made clear that the scheme for compelling evidence for use outside the jurisdiction was exclusively statutory. Therefore, the legislation was necessary to confer on the courts power to compel the giving of evidence to be used in overseas proceedings and, accordingly, the jurisdiction had always been exclusively statutory. The result was that the power of the courts to use Norwich Pharmacal proceedings had to be developed within the confines of the existence of the statutory regime through which evidence in such proceedings overseas had to be obtained. Norwich Pharmacal proceedings were not ousted, but where proceedings were brought to obtain evidence, the court as a matter of principle ought to decline to make orders for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll