header-logo header-logo

European Union—Freedom of movement—Right of residence

05 March 2010
Issue: 7407 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Teixeira v Lambeth London Borough Council and another C-480/08, [2010] All ER (D) 249 (Feb)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber),
23 February 2010

The Court of Justice of the European Union has given a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of Art 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) 1612/68 (on freedom of movement for workers within the Community, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) 2434/92) (Reg 1612/68), and of Parliament and Council Directive (EC) 2004/38 (on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states, amending Reg 1612/68) in relation to a claim for housing assistance.

Judges Skouris (President), Cunha Rodrigues, Lenaerts, Bonichot and Lindh (Presidents of Chambers), Timmermans, Rosas (Rapporteur), Schiemann, Kuris, Juhasz, Bay Larsen, von Danwitz and Arabadjiev
The claimant Portuguese national arrived in the UK in 1989 with her husband, also a Portuguese national. They worked in the UK from 1989 to 1991. Their daughter was born in the UK in June 1991. They later

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll