header-logo header-logo

24 February 2021
Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

European Commission ponders next steps for UK-EU data flow

The European Commission has taken steps towards ensuring the flow of personal data between the UK and the rest of Europe can continue after the 30 June cut-off point.

The commission launched the process for two adequacy decisions for transfers of personal data to be adopted, one under the General Data Protection Regulation and the other for the Law Enforcement Directive. Next steps include gaining the approval of a committee of representatives of the EU member states.

Didier Reynders, commissioner for justice, said: ‘A flow of secure data between the EU and the UK is crucial to maintain close trade ties and cooperate effectively in the fight against crime.’

Currently, data flows between the UK and European Economic Area (EEA) courtesy of an interim regime established by the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which is due to expire on 30 June 2021.

David Greene, president of the Law Society, said adoption of the two decisions ‘would be of significant benefit to our members and their clients.

‘Without formal adequacy recognition, UK organisations will need to have in place alternative safeguards to ensure they may continue to receive personal data from the EU and EEA, such as standard contractual clauses or another transfer mechanism. Until the adequacy decisions are adopted, we continue to advise the profession to continue to prepare in the event that adequacy is not approved by the EU.’

A report published by the Centre for European Reform (CER) this week highlighted the need for the UK government to try to reduce the risk of restrictions on the cross-border flow of data.

The report, ‘Keeping up appearances: what now for UK services trade?’, also called on the government to create a stable policy environment, liberalise its immigration regime and seek continued preferential access to the EU market where possible. This would help make the UK an attractive location in which multinational services firms can invest and establish themselves. 

Issue: 7922 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll