header-logo header-logo

Europe online

23 March 2012 / Colin Moore , David Hertzell
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
istock_000016393107medium_4

David Hertzell & Colin Moore examine the potential benefits & pitfalls of the Common European Sales Law

The European Commission published a proposed regulation for a Common European Sales Law (CESL) in October 2011. Its intention is to improve cross-border trade within the EU by removing legal barriers which increase the cost of doing business with other member states. As the title makes clear, the CESL is a proposed law for the sale of goods (and certain related services) across Europe. In essence it is two separate proposals: one for business-to-business transactions (considered in “The wrong vehicle”, 161 NLJ 7490, p 1589) and the other for business-to-consumer transactions.

The Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission were asked to advise the government about the potential advantages and problems of the CESL. This article focuses on business-to-consumer sales. The Commissions think that there is a case for an optional distance selling code, which could bring benefits to British businesses, but much more thought needs to be given to the details of the proposal.

Rome I:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll