header-logo header-logo

EU: who’s in and who’s out?

25 February 2016
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The Justice Secretary set his hat against the Prime Minister last week as the cabinet split over the EU vote.

With 23 June confirmed as the EU referendum date, the scene is set for a clash of titans: Eurosceptic Michael Gove versus pro-EU David Cameron.

Gove explained in a statement that: “The EU tries to standardise and regulate rather than encourage diversity and innovation.”

He said: “Rules like the EU clinical trials directive have slowed down the creation of new drugs to cure terrible diseases and European Court of Justice judgments on data protection issues hobble the growth of internet companies.”

Gove’s stance puts him at odds not only with the PM but also large parts of the legal profession.

About 300 lawyers have formed a campaign group, Lawyers–In for Britain, to support Britain’s membership of the EU. The group has held several events, and is due to launch a report later this month setting out its case.

Separately, City firms are urging clients to consider the implications of a Brexit. A recent survey commissioned by Herbert Smith Freehills found that, of 200 UK-based businesses, most of the companies’ boards of directors have not yet formally considered the impact of a Brexit on their activities.

 

Issue: 7688 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll