header-logo header-logo

Estate planning: Liability matters

24 September 2020 / Jennifer Haywood
Issue: 7903 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
28046
Discharging estate liability can be a complex and challenging task. In the light of a recent decision, Jennifer Haywood outlines a court’s approach to ascertaining liabilities

In brief

  • Section 27 of the Trustee Act 1925 exempts personal representatives from liability for claims of which they do not have notice within two months of a suitable advertisement.
  • However, a personal representative may be regarded as being on notice of a class of claims, even if no one comes forward.
  • Re the Estate of Michael Studdert [2020] EWHC 1869 (Ch): a recent example of a personal representative being on notice, where there is reason to believe that the deceased has committed sexual assaults.

Being a personal representative can seem an invidious task. Claims against a deceased person endure against his estate (save for defamation), and a personal representative is obliged to ascertain the estate’s liabilities and arrangement for their payment in priority to any distribution to the beneficiaries. If a personal representative fails to discharge any estate liability, he may be personally liable.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll