header-logo header-logo

Epping injunction overturned

01 September 2025
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Planning , Local authority
printer mail-detail
Judges have lifted an interim injunction on asylum seekers being housed at the Bell Hotel, Epping, and held the Home Office and hotel owners can intervene in the case

Lord Justice Bean, sitting with Lady Justice Nicola Davies and Lord Justice Cobb, emphasised the appeal was not concerned with the merits of government policy regarding asylum seeker accommodation. They held the High Court judge, Mr Justice Eyre, erred by ignoring the consequence that the closure of one site means capacity has to be found elsewhere.

Bean LJ said the injunction ‘may incentivise’ other councils to follow suit, and the impact of ‘such ad-hoc applications was a material consideration… that was not considered by the judge’.

Epping Forest District Council successfully sought the injunction in August on the basis of a breach of planning laws. The hotel, which has housed asylum seekers since 2020, recently became the focus of protest after a man living in the hotel was charged with the sexual assault of a teenage girl.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll