header-logo header-logo

05 November 2009 / Deborah Tompkinson , Antonio Bueno KC
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Enforcing agreements

Part two: agreements to negotiate, are they enforceable? ask Antonio Bueno QC & Deborah Tompkinson

In the previous article, we reviewed decisions on the enforceability of clauses in commercial contracts requiring parties to negotiate in good faith.

The article identified a tension between, at one extreme, the refusal to enforce, exemplified in the decision in Walford v Miles [1992] 2 AC 128, House of Lords, and a number of Court of Appeal decisions which distinguished it and enforced such clauses. 

We noted the clarification and guidance to be found in the Court of Appeal decision in Petromec Inc Petro-Deep Societa Armamento Navi Appoggio SPA v Petrobras Brasileiro SA [2006] 1 Lloyd’s 121, which this article reviews.

Petromec

This was a complex case. The relevant part for present purposes relates to a number of contracts concerning the purchase, charter and insurance of an oil production platform. The transactions anticipated the need to upgrade the platform at some future stage. As a result of the discovery of a new oil field (Rocandor) while

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll