header-logo header-logo

Enforcing agreements

05 November 2009 / Deborah Tompkinson , Antonio Bueno KC
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Part two: agreements to negotiate, are they enforceable? ask Antonio Bueno QC & Deborah Tompkinson

In the previous article, we reviewed decisions on the enforceability of clauses in commercial contracts requiring parties to negotiate in good faith.

The article identified a tension between, at one extreme, the refusal to enforce, exemplified in the decision in Walford v Miles [1992] 2 AC 128, House of Lords, and a number of Court of Appeal decisions which distinguished it and enforced such clauses. 

We noted the clarification and guidance to be found in the Court of Appeal decision in Petromec Inc Petro-Deep Societa Armamento Navi Appoggio SPA v Petrobras Brasileiro SA [2006] 1 Lloyd’s 121, which this article reviews.

Petromec

This was a complex case. The relevant part for present purposes relates to a number of contracts concerning the purchase, charter and insurance of an oil production platform. The transactions anticipated the need to upgrade the platform at some future stage. As a result of the discovery of a new oil field (Rocandor) while

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll