header-logo header-logo

04 June 2015
Issue: 7655 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal claims pick up

The slump in employment tribunal claims that followed the rise in fees last year appears to have reversed.

Figures gathered by Hugh James Solicitors reveal the number of multiple claims jumped 75% in 12 months, from 10,840 to 18,940 in the third quarter of 2014.

After fees were introduced in July 2013 there was a steep decline in the number of claims being brought. Statistics showed an 81% drop in claims lodged between April and June 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.

However, Hugh James say the number of claims is now rebounding as disgruntled former employees adjust to the new fees and weigh the financial risks against the potential payout.

The requirement, from 6 May 2014, for employees to attempt to use the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service’s (ACAS) early conciliation service before lodging a tribunal case may also have affected claims. Since this service became mandatory, the total number of claims has doubled, although certain types of easily resolvable cases have reduced in number, for example, redundancy payment cases have fallen by nearly a third.

Emma Burns, partner at Hugh James, says: “The cost for launching a claim is £160 to £250—when they were first introduced it was a shock, but now people are more acclimatised to these fees.

“With straightforward cases, such as a dispute over whether or not redundancy payments were made, the ACAS service seems to be successful in clearing issues up more quickly, so changes to the system are helping.”

Issue: 7655 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll