header-logo header-logo

09 October 2015 / John McMullen
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment matters

nlj_7671_mcmullen

John McMullen discusses unfair dismissal & reasonableness

When examining an employer’s decision to dismiss, a number of well established principles come into play for the purposes of the test of fairness in s 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996).

First, in relation to alleged conduct, the test for establishing a fair reason for dismissal is laid down by British Home Stores Limited v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379, [1980] ICR 303n. The employer must genuinely believe the employee is guilty of the conduct and hold that belief on reasonable grounds following a reasonable investigation. The employment tribunal then has to consider whether the employer’s decision to dismiss on the ground of that conduct fell within the range of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer (Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones [1982] IRLR 439, [1983] ICR 17). An employment tribunal must not substitute its own view for that of a dismissing employer. In other words it must avoid a “substitution mind set” (London Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Small [2009] IRLR 563,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll